Coach's Show with Kim English

[tblack33]

YouTube stream doesn't appear to be working.

The George Mason Basketball Coach's Show with Kim English, presented by SN Mortgage Company | Join George Mason men's basketball head coach Kim English and "Voice of the Patriots" Bill Rohland as the Patriots kick-off the 2021-22 basketball season...

Join George Mason men's basketball head coach Kim English and "Voice of the Patriots" Bill Rohland as the Patriots kick-off the 2021-22 basketball season...

fb.watch

Facebook stream is coming in crystal clear. Sounds like a some people made it out to watch live too.

 

[GMU79]

"You'll never hear me say, wait till I get my guys as an excuse or crutch."

Thank. God. Like a kid on Christmas eve right now.

Wow! Assuming responsibility from the get-go! Now there's a novel approach.

 

[BBride]

Josh Oduro
Body fat - July 14.6, now 6.8. Lean, mean rebounding machine!

 

[JPgmuswim]

I really enjoyed it. I look forward to seeing this weekly show, hopefully it gains some traction and more than 35 of us watch the live feed.

I also hope the school can get some fans in the seats. It’s definitely going to take some time to happen.

 

[mkaufman1]

Loved listening to this and hope it continues beyond this year

 

[tblack33]

Numbers of viewers for this will increase when the wins start piling up. Right now it’s just the diehards.

 

[tblack33]

Overall I enjoyed it and am glad they are doing it. Hope they start taking some viewer questions at some point.

 

[Patriot8]

There were about 50 people there to watch the show in-restaurant. Very good turnout.

 

[Five Two]

Kim wasn't kidding when he was talking about Tennessee's non-conference schedule:
-Villanova and either UNC or Purdue in Connecticut
-at Colorado
-Texas Tech at MSG
-Memphis in Nashville
-home to Arizona
-home to East Tennessee St and UNC Greensboro who have been "on the bubble" programs (at worst) the past few years

It would take Georgetown three seasons to play that many quality non-conference opponents....

 

[GMU79]

Kim wasn't kidding when he was talking about Tennessee's non-conference schedule:
-Villanova and either UNC or Purdue in Connecticut
-at Colorado
-Texas Tech at MSG
-Memphis in Nashville
-home to Arizona
-home to East Tennessee St and UNC Greensboro who have been "on the bubble" programs (at worst) the past few years

It would take Georgetown three seasons to play that many quality non-conference opponents....

St. Leo's is not a quality non-conference opponent!? Who knew!?

 

[Jack Strop]

Too bad the show is not recorded and posted.

 

[FreeGunston12]

Too bad the show is not recorded and posted.

Except that it is. On facebook.

 

[Patriot8]

Kim wasn't kidding when he was talking about Tennessee's non-conference schedule:
-Villanova and either UNC or Purdue in Connecticut
-at Colorado
-Texas Tech at MSG
-Memphis in Nashville
-home to Arizona
-home to East Tennessee St and UNC Greensboro who have been "on the bubble" programs (at worst) the past few years

It would take Georgetown three seasons to play that many quality non-conference opponents....

The “scheduling teams who are projected to finish near the top of their conference” ideology that KE mentioned last night is something I’ve heard from Barnes several times over the years.

 

[gmubrian]

The “scheduling teams who are projected to finish near the top of their conference” ideology that KE mentioned last night is something I’ve heard from Barnes several times over the years.

At face value (without examining the actual ranking math) it seems kind of risky from a qualifying for the tournament standpoint. I would think that top teams in low conferences could end up with low NET rankings because the play so many low NET teams even if they are actually good. So, their NET maybe lower than deserved. They might be good enough to beat you, as well. So, you don't get credit for beating a good team if you win and you risk losing to them at the same time.

That is what it would seem to me, what is wrong with my logic here?

 

[tblack33]

At face value (without examining the actual ranking math) it seems kind of risky from a qualifying for the tournament standpoint. I would think that top teams in low conferences could end up with low NET rankings because the play so many low NET teams even if they are actually good. So, their NET maybe lower than deserved. They might be good enough to beat you, as well. So, you don't get credit for beating a good team if you win and you risk losing to them at the same time.

That is what it would seem to me, what is wrong with my logic here?

Agree with this exactly. Our SOS is going to look pretty bad, even if some of these teams win their leagues they’ll still be in the 150-200 range in NET. All risk, little reward. I’d like to see us schedule to be in the top 25% in the A10 for SOS by year 3.

 

[Five Two]

At face value (without examining the actual ranking math) it seems kind of risky from a qualifying for the tournament standpoint. I would think that top teams in low conferences could end up with low NET rankings because the play so many low NET teams even if they are actually good. So, their NET maybe lower than deserved. They might be good enough to beat you, as well. So, you don't get credit for beating a good team if you win and you risk losing to them at the same time.

That is what it would seem to me, what is wrong with my logic here?

Agreed for us, but for Tennessee is going to play in the SEC so whatever the NET risks are by playing ETSU and Greensboro are trumped by the SEC NET benefits. Like you, I'm saying that without looking at the numbers

 

[Walter]

Except that it is. On facebook.

In best 79 voice, where? How do I find it? You dang kids with your highfalutin Facebook thingy!

 

[GMUgemini]

At face value (without examining the actual ranking math) it seems kind of risky from a qualifying for the tournament standpoint. I would think that top teams in low conferences could end up with low NET rankings because the play so many low NET teams even if they are actually good. So, their NET maybe lower than deserved. They might be good enough to beat you, as well. So, you don't get credit for beating a good team if you win and you risk losing to them at the same time.

That is what it would seem to me, what is wrong with my logic here?

Depends on how low down the totem poll you go.

So here’s a list of conference leaders and their NET (Conferencr order is conference rank: Southern is 10th-OVC 28th).

Southern: Furnan (75)
MVC: Loyola-Chicago (10)
MWC: San Siego State (18)
Patriot: Colgate (9)
Conference USA: North Texas (59)
MAC: Toledo (67)
CAA: Drexel (135)
Big West: Santa Barbara (54)
Sun Belt: Georgia State (128)
America East: Vermont( 115)
MAAC: Iona (138)
Northeast: Bryant (128)
WAC: Abilene Christian (74)
Horizon: Wright State (71)
Atlantic Sun: Liberty (86)
Big South: Winthrop (55)
Summit: SDSt (123)
OVC: Belmont (90)

 

[GMU79]

In best 79 voice, where? How do I find it? You dang kids with your highfalutin Facebook thingy!

 

[tblack33]

Depends on how low down the totem poll you go.

So here’s a list of conference leaders and their NET (Conferencr order is conference rank: Southern is 10th-OVC 28th).

Southern: Furnan (75)
MVC: Loyola-Chicago (10)
MWC: San Siego State (18)
Patriot: Colgate (9)
Conference USA: North Texas (59)
MAC: Toledo (67)
CAA: Drexel (135)
Big West: Santa Barbara (54)
Sun Belt: Georgia State (128)
America East: Vermont( 115)
MAAC: Iona (138)
Northeast: Bryant (128)
WAC: Abilene Christian (74)
Horizon: Wright State (71)
Atlantic Sun: Liberty (86)
Big South: Winthrop (55)
Summit: SDSt (123)
OVC: Belmont (90)

I guess I stand corrected then.