2024 Transfer Portal - Potential Incoming and General Discussion

OP
jessej

jessej

All-Conference
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GIVING DAY 2023
Due to graduation and the portal we lost 48.3 points and 22.0 rebonds per game from the roster last season. Due to the portal, as of 4/19/24, we have gained 46.8 points and 16.5 rebounds per game. So, on paper we've pretty much matched the lost production with a few more new guys to come.

The 23-24 roster shot a combined 218-637 (34.2%) from 3. The incoming and remaining players were a combined 161-462 (34.85%) which on paper also appears to be a wash, at least from the standpoint of percentages.

What does all this mean? LOL. Who knows! I'm just bored.

Some will look at the numbers above and be optimistic. Others will think it's comparing apples to oranges since the numbers posted by the new guys occurred at lower levels. Will their production continue at the A10 level? Historically we've done okay with the portal. We've gained some good players who have posted some good numbers. But the bottom line is that portal players, thus far, have not taken us to the dance.

My way too early thoughts are that we should be bigger, stronger, more physical, and more productive in the post next season. On the flip side getting some guys who can fill it up from outside is still a big need. We may be adequate/good/very good at the point, although small at 5'11 and 5'10.

With Keyshawn out of the picture it is my hope that the roster will be filled with team guys, rather than selfish individuals who are a cancer in the locker room. Our portal guys, for the most part, have gone down leagues which says a lot about the roster last season.

The jury is still out. Time will tell. Waiting for the next announcements. Cautiously optimistic at this point.

And yes, I know it's only Tony's second year. I still have faith he'll get the job done.
Interesting perspective

If our exiting transfers have moved down, which of our incoming transfers have moved up? and which have moved down? and what does that say about their expected performance levels?
 

Verdad

Starter
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
Due to graduation and the portal we lost 48.3 points and 22.0 rebonds per game from the roster last season. Due to the portal, as of 4/19/24, we have gained 46.8 points and 16.5 rebounds per game. So, on paper we've pretty much matched the lost production with a few more new guys to come.

The 23-24 roster shot a combined 218-637 (34.2%) from 3. The incoming and remaining players were a combined 161-462 (34.85%) which on paper also appears to be a wash, at least from the standpoint of percentages.

What does all this mean? LOL. Who knows! I'm just bored.

Some will look at the numbers above and be optimistic. Others will think it's comparing apples to oranges since the numbers posted by the new guys occurred at lower levels. Will their production continue at the A10 level? Historically we've done okay with the portal. We've gained some good players who have posted some good numbers. But the bottom line is that portal players, thus far, have not taken us to the dance.

My way too early thoughts are that we should be bigger, stronger, more physical, and more productive in the post next season. On the flip side getting some guys who can fill it up from outside is still a big need. We may be adequate/good/very good at the point, although small at 5'11 and 5'10.

With Keyshawn out of the picture it is my hope that the roster will be filled with team guys, rather than selfish individuals who are a cancer in the locker room. Our portal guys, for the most part, have gone down leagues which says a lot about the roster last season.

The jury is still out. Time will tell. Waiting for the next announcements. Cautiously optimistic at this point.

And yes, I know it's only Tony's second year. I still have faith he'll get the job done.

Agreed - statistically we have now built a roster comparable to last years with our current projected top 8 - but we aren't done adding and at least one, maybe more, of the listed projected starters on my pdf may be bumped down :)
 

gmujim92

Hall of Famer
GIVING DAY 2023
Due to graduation and the portal we lost 48.3 points and 22.0 rebonds per game from the roster last season. Due to the portal, as of 4/19/24, we have gained 46.8 points and 16.5 rebounds per game. So, on paper we've pretty much matched the lost production with a few more new guys to come.

The 23-24 roster shot a combined 218-637 (34.2%) from 3. The incoming and remaining players were a combined 161-462 (34.85%) which on paper also appears to be a wash, at least from the standpoint of percentages.

What does all this mean? LOL. Who knows! I'm just bored.

Some will look at the numbers above and be optimistic. Others will think it's comparing apples to oranges since the numbers posted by the new guys occurred at lower levels. Will their production continue at the A10 level? Historically we've done okay with the portal. We've gained some good players who have posted some good numbers. But the bottom line is that portal players, thus far, have not taken us to the dance.

My way too early thoughts are that we should be bigger, stronger, more physical, and more productive in the post next season. On the flip side getting some guys who can fill it up from outside is still a big need. We may be adequate/good/very good at the point, although small at 5'11 and 5'10.

With Keyshawn out of the picture it is my hope that the roster will be filled with team guys, rather than selfish individuals who are a cancer in the locker room. Our portal guys, for the most part, have gone down leagues which says a lot about the roster last season.

The jury is still out. Time will tell. Waiting for the next announcements. Cautiously optimistic at this point.

And yes, I know it's only Tony's second year. I still have faith he'll get the job done.
No idea how realistic it is at this point, but if Tony was able to add a 45% 3-point shooting stretch 4 in Zach Anderson to the current roster, that’s an NCAA-caliber team. Feels like he would be the ideal final piece to a puzzle that’s coming together nicely.

Like Drew Valentine did at Loyola last year, we need to be able to play 10-11 guys in the regular rotation to sustain the type of intensity and energy Tony is looking for.

They won a lot of close games in the last 3 minutes by wearing opponents down, beating them up and making it hard for them to score.

Right now we’re at 8: Haynes, Emejuru, Newton, Maddox, O’Connor, Ball, Billups and Quigley.

Expect Begg to contribute — he’s a stud — but not sure about Cokley in Year 1.
 

EXpatriot13

All-Conference
GIVING DAY 2023
No idea how realistic it is at this point, but if Tony was able to add a 45% 3-point shooting stretch 4 in Zach Anderson to the current roster, that’s an NCAA-caliber team. Feels like he would be the ideal final piece to a puzzle that’s coming together nicely.
This guy has been at the top of my list, praying Tony can reel him in. A stretch 4 with proven scoring ability from all levels.

If we're somehow able to land him + the additions we've already made....I'd be most excited about how that could potentially open things up for Maddox next season.
 

Old Man

Starter
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GOLD SPONSOR
GIVING DAY 2023
Agreed - statistically we have now built a roster comparable to last years with our current projected top 8 - but we aren't done adding and at least one, maybe more, of the listed projected starters on my pdf may be bumped down :)
And while you're figuring the points lost vs points gained, remember Haynes has yet to take a single shot in a game for us, so go count his ETSU games. So there are those points to be added as well.
 

Verdad

Starter
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
1713793585754.png
 

Patriotsince81

Hall of Famer
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GOLD SPONSOR
I wish we could get to 80 offensively. It would sure give us more margin of error. Just out of curiosity I looked up our ppg of late.

23-24 - 71.0
22-23 - 68.7
21-22 - 70.7
20-21 - 71.6
19-20 - 67.1
18-19 - 70.1
17-18 - 71.8
16-17 - 74.1
15-16 - 66.9

I can foresee 4 -5 guys averaging double figures this coming year which would make it difficult for opponents to key on any one or two guys. Fingers crossed.
 

gmutom

Hall of Famer
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GOLD SPONSOR
GIVING DAY 2023
I wish we could get to 80 offensively. It would sure give us more margin of error. Just out of curiosity I looked up our ppg of late.

23-24 - 71.0
22-23 - 68.7
21-22 - 70.7
20-21 - 71.6
19-20 - 67.1
18-19 - 70.1
17-18 - 71.8
16-17 - 74.1
15-16 - 66.9

I can foresee 4 -5 guys averaging double figures this coming year which would make it difficult for opponents to key on any one or two guys. Fingers crossed.
Averaging 80 points is a lot in college basketball. Even 5 guys averaging 15 points a game only gets you to 75. I’d rather focus on keeping teams under 70, because I think that gives us the more realistic margin of error.
 

Patriotsince81

Hall of Famer
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GOLD SPONSOR
Averaging 80 points is a lot in college basketball. Even 5 guys averaging 15 points a game only gets you to 75. I’d rather focus on keeping teams under 70, because I think that gives us the more realistic margin of error.
39 teams hit that mark last year. As I said it would be nice, not expecting it, but it would be nice. While we're at it let's hit 80+ offensively and keep opponents under 65 while we're at it.
 

EXpatriot13

All-Conference
GIVING DAY 2023
Zach Anderson visited Indiana over the weekend. Their fanbase seem excited about him (reading X) and the possibility of him committing, but some are concerned about him not wanting to come off the bench.

It was an unofficial visit. Hopefully IU is holding out for a better player and/or can’t offer him the playing time he’s looking for.
 

gmujim92

Hall of Famer
GIVING DAY 2023
Zach Anderson visited Indiana over the weekend. Their fanbase seem excited about him (reading X) and the possibility of him committing, but some are concerned about him not wanting to come off the bench.

It was an unofficial visit. Hopefully IU is holding out for a better player and/or can’t offer him the playing time he’s looking for.
Seems they are a favorite to land Illinois transfer Luke Goode, who is also a 6-7 wing. Hope they get him — Anderson would be a massive get for Mason and take our roster to another level.
 
Last edited:

gmulion

Specialist
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GOLD SPONSOR
Any word on how the visit went for Caelum Swanton-Rodger went? The roster seems to be very guard heavy. It would be nice to land another big.
 

EXpatriot13

All-Conference
GIVING DAY 2023
Seems they are a favorite to land Illinois transfer Luke Goode, who is also a 6-7 wing. Hope they get him — Anderson would be a massive get for Mason and take our roster to another level.
Already seeing a bunch of "crystal ball" predictions having him landing at Indiana. Let's hope that moves quickly and shifts Anderson's attention back to us.

I'm not a predictions guy, but I will firmly expect top 4 if we can land Anderson.
 
Top