I can’t find it. Please help me find it.This is a must see video!
This is a must see video!
Which episode of Sue’s places is it ?
I can’t find it. Please help me find it.This is a must see video!
This is a must see video!
Sues places episode 9 - if the sneaker fits - ESPN+I can’t find it. Please help me find it.
Which episode of Sue’s places is it ?
Fitting tittle! Thanks!Sues places episode 9 - if the sneaker fits - ESPN+
Cool video! But Mason is the best Cinderella story.Sues places episode 9 - if the sneaker fits - ESPN+
I can appreciate your sentiment here, but also keep in mind that Tony got the job last March and had to put together almost a full roster within 2 months. Kelly lost his cool and then didn't have another issue throughout the entire year (to my recollection).I’m quite pleased with Skinn’s performance so far; he’s done an excellent job. However, I have some reservations about the character of the recruits:
• Kelly kicked a guy in the head.
• Hall’s reputation speaks for itself.
That said, I’m not jumping ship. I’m extremely glad he’s our coach; I think he’ll get us dancing. Just pointing out a tiny concern of mine about the recruits’ character.
at least nobody murdered someoneI’m quite pleased with Skinn’s performance so far; he’s done an excellent job. However, I have some reservations about the character of the recruits:
• Kelly kicked a guy in the head.
• Hall’s reputation speaks for itself.
That said, I’m not jumping ship. I’m extremely glad he’s our coach; I think he’ll get us dancing. Just pointing out a tiny concern of mine about the recruits’ character.
All good points.I can appreciate your sentiment here, but also keep in mind that Tony got the job last March and had to put together almost a full roster within 2 months. Kelly lost his cool and then didn't have another issue throughout the entire year (to my recollection).
As far as Hall goes, we took a chance with a knucklehead and tried to win. It didn't work out, and hopefully we can find players as talented who don't come with the baggage. I applaud the staff for taking a chance.
Hopefully Tony and the staff learned from it, and can assemble a roster of talent that works well together, wants to be at Mason and plays extremely good basketball. Having good kids is a plus, but the occasional knucklehead is going to happen. If you don't take chances, you end up with a team of nice kids and not the best talent much like Paulsen used to assemble.
And rosters are going to be very much year to year. If you retain even 5-6 guys, then that is a plus.
Not to mention that Skinn is a prime example of someone that lost their cool in the heat of competition once. He's going to give guys second chances and help guys find the balance between playing with an edge and keeping their cool.All good points.
I think this idea popped in my head after watching the Dan Hurley interview where he said he doesn’t recruit guys who bounce from school to school.
Plus I actually liked that Kelly played with a bit of an attitude.
Hurley is full of shit two of his top 3 scoring players were transfers.All good points.
I think this idea popped in my head after watching the Dan Hurley interview where he said he doesn’t recruit guys who bounce from school to school.
Plus I actually liked that Kelly played with a bit of an attitude.
All good, and yeah I liked that he had an overall edge to him. i don’t want guys punching guys or kicking but it’s nice to see he was playing as physical as possible. And clarifying Hurleys point, he didn’t want to recruit guys who have been to several high schools and several teams already. Not to say he won’t take transfers, but when a guy has a history of leaving for a new school every year in both high school and college, he doesn’t touch it.All good points.
I think this idea popped in my head after watching the Dan Hurley interview where he said he doesn’t recruit guys who bounce from school to school.
Plus I actually liked that Kelly played with a bit of an attitude.
Hall is an example of that, several high schools and now 3 colleges in 3 years.
Lol yes it is sorta like that. TBF, job hopping when explained and justified (contracts ending / laid off / life change) doesn't always mean they won't work out well.Yep. It's called being a "job-hopper". I've seen the type before in my career. They have 10 previous jobs listed on their résumés, none lasting more than a year—many only six months. Bubbly personality. Cute and charming. Everyone's darling. Center of attention. Overactive ego. Generally works hard. Wants to be and is seen and appreciated. But they get bored or frustrated easily. They realize their novelty to others has worn thin and they're not willing to share the spot light. When others stop gushing over them they quickly split, in no long order to make a shiny, new appearance and impression elsewhere. And everyone left behind asks, "Why did he/she leave? What did WE do to make him/her split? Was it OUR fault?" Sound familiar?
All good points.
I think this idea popped in my head after watching the Dan Hurley interview where he said he doesn’t recruit guys who bounce from school to school.
Plus I actually liked that Kelly played with a bit of an attitude.
Hurley is full of shit two of his top 3 scoring players were transfers.
And why it’s so important to have a coach who is thoughtful about how a roster comes together instead of just loading up on guys who all do the same thing well. Putting the ball in the bucket may be the most fun part of the game, but you have to have people who are willing to play different roles to have success as a team.Hmmmm how the game has changed
Not long ago ...you were saddled with who you recruited and how they turned out. You might get a transfer out. But you usually had to work with what you ended up with for a few years. At best if you had balanced classes, you hoped your newcomers each year could over take your previous guys.
Now? Every season is a treasure hunt. I can see why the "positive outlook" for a coach is.... I go shopping and get the pieces I need in a PROVEN player just about every year.
It might be a bit harder to organize and disruptive to longer term continuity, but you can also effect roster change fast.....
Hmmmm how the game has changed
Not long ago ...you were saddled with who you recruited and how they turned out. You might get a transfer out. But you usually had to work with what you ended up with for a few years. At best if you had balanced classes, you hoped your newcomers each year could over take your previous guys.
Now? Every season is a treasure hunt. I can see why the "positive outlook" for a coach is.... I go shopping and get the pieces I need in a PROVEN player just about every year.
It might be a bit harder to organize and disruptive to longer term continuity, but you can also effect roster change fast.....
Yep- the good comes with the bad.And why it’s so important to have a coach who is thoughtful about how a roster comes together instead of just loading up on guys who all do the same thing well. Putting the ball in the bucket may be the most fun part of the game, but you have to have people who are willing to play different roles to have success as a team.