So just who is this Joe Lunardi guy anyway?But... Lunardi does mention that if you're non-con SoS is over 300... good luck getting in if you are on the bubble
So just who is this Joe Lunardi guy anyway?But... Lunardi does mention that if you're non-con SoS is over 300... good luck getting in if you are on the bubble
So just who is this Joe Lunardi guy anyway?
So just who is this Joe Lunardi guy anyway?
It was in the sarcasm font.
oops...missed that. But given that he's been doing the Bracketology thing for a number of years, his opinions are reasonably informed.It was in the sarcasm font.
Yes, indeed they are.oops...missed that. But given that he's been doing the Bracketology thing for a number of years, his opinions are reasonably informed.
How does one miss that??oops...missed that. But given that he's been doing the Bracketology thing for a number of years, his opinions are reasonably informed.
Simple. Haven't yet gotten used to the idea that italics mean sarcasm.How does one miss that??
It’s just the evolution of GMU79, who says you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.Simple. Haven't yet gotten used to the idea that italics mean sarcasm.
Last week I exchanged posts with GMU79 explaining the "6-7" phenomenon. Erroneously, this time I thought he genuinely wasn't aware of Lunardi
What do you mean “was”? I very much still am, thank youIt’s just the evolution of GMU79, who says you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.
GMU79, remember when you almost left early on because everyone on here was sarcastic jerks?![]()
Yeah, I remember.It’s just the evolution of GMU79, who says you can’t teach an old dog new tricks.
GMU79, remember when you almost left early on because everyone on here was sarcastic jerks?![]()