GMU_Polevaulter
Specialist
"Mason will never get go over the hump if they have to start over every year. The program needs continuity to get back to the NCAA and the fans need to pay to play."
What make us think Mason fans will pay? All we did after getting to a Final 4 was lose a coach, start a slow decline, move to a higher level conference, and languish in the middle. Attendance has declined since 2006, and keeps declining in spite of Tony's amazing effort to makes us a factor in the A10.
The real question is are we just throwing good money after bad? What if we raise prices and even fewer folks come? What happens 3-4 years from now if Mason finds itself in the same situation (still not enough money to buy a competitive team) and we have driven away the low end of the fan base? What happens when the Sugar Daddy who Mason has been searching for forever, never comes? What makes us think our ability to compete in the "New NCAA World" will be any better then than it is today?
Hate to be the one to say it, but I hope there is a plan B at Mason Athletics that includes things like: Keeping an eye out for a conference that may be a better fiscal fit, being an active participant in planning the inevitable split of the NCAA between the big NIL teams and the non-NIL teams, and having a team thinking about how to be the most competitive if/when that day comes, etc.
I may be wrong about this, and I'd happily admit to being so if we suddenly start winning the A10 regularly, and start getting 6,000 butts in seats for every game like we did in in 2007, when we were in the CAA. But having been a Mason fan for 40 years, and watched games back in the gym with 250 people, I just want us to be realistic, spend what is likely to continue to be scarce money wisely, and embrace the loyal community rather than focus on fickle high roller
You are correct and my opinion above already happened in my section - 114 which was the budget friendly family section. When I became a season ticket holder in 2006 - people in seats all around me. Changes started in 2021/2022 - Family section changed pricing model (fewer seats for the same price) and added seat fees at the same time. Fewer people around me. Seat fees increased and this past year - many games it was a ghost town around my seats.i see price increases in literally everything,
as someone who is retired and living on a pension check and social security i am forced to make choices as to how much I will spend and what i will spend on
but there is a wrong assumption of suppliers that most people will continue to pay as price increases
for "normal" goods if the price increases 10% and the demand drops 10% you still have the same amount of revenue, but at a loss of scale effects
so realistically if prices increase by 10% then demand needs to fall by less than 10% to keep the same revenue.
in addition, the cost structure must also be reduced as to account for the loss of scale effects. For an athletic department this usually means staffing layoffs.
This standard model is not what athletic programs need to follow
1) revenue from empty seats can never be gotten once the game is over
2) less fans in the stands watching a game is bad in multiple dimensions
a) less potential customers for concessions - and they probably have also had a rent increase
b) less fans in the stands for televised games
leading to a decline is quality/value of the game perception;
leading to less TV contract value;
leading to less total team revenues
I hope that the GMU staff has worked thru all of this and has a plan so that it doesn't happen to them.
I am glad that this current athletic department administration has begun to address some of the problems of the past. I just hope they can continue to address these issues as well as the needed NIL issues.
In my opinion, what GMU really needs is 10 $1M per year basketball donors.